Twitter.com e-edition subscribe online Chippewa.com

Advertisement



Updated Jan 05, 2009 - 11:05:42 CST

Web Search
powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Herald Archives
adv search

News

Who Makes Your Day?












Bloomer Schools looking at making cuts




The slumping economy is hurting nearly everyone. Businesses are losing revenue, individuals are losing jobs and wages, and school districts are feeling the pinch as well.

The Bloomer School District will have to cut $200,000 from its 2009-2010 budget, and the Cadott Community School District is holding steady despite huge hurdles.

Bloomer Superintendent Mary Randall said the district began looking at next school year’s budget in November and realized that cuts will have to be made.

The district has yet to identify where those cuts will come. Randall has met with administrators and plans to meet with staff this month to get their input on where reductions can be made.

“I already have the administrators’ input, and when you ask staff members, they have opinions because they work with the children every day and they know where the resources need to be,” Randall said.

The cuts are needed largely because contracts with all district staff had been in negotiation and were behind by two years.

The budget was balanced before those negotiations concluded.

“Those reductions, you know they’re coming when you wait two years to settle a contract,” Randall said.

Anticipated declining revenues and changes to a law that caps teachers’ pay have led to the district to look at trimming the budget in the future as well.

“I think we’ll be facing some reductions for the next two or three years,” Randall said.

Bloomer expects another $100,000 will have to be cut in 2010-2011, but any budgets past that are hard to anticipate. The 2008-2009 budget levied $4 million.

“The importance of making our reductions early is we don’t face a big fallout in the end,” Randall said.

She admits the cuts will be hard on the district, but they have to be done in order to balance the budget.

“I think any time that you’re making cuts it’s painful for everyone, because generally those cuts come in reduced services to children,” Randall said. “It’s always nice when you can add programs and services to students, and it’s always painful when you have to take those away.”

Cadott

Cadott Community School District isn’t being hit by any reductions at this time, Superintendent Guy Habeck said.

The district has an $8.7 million 2008-2009 budget, and is keeping afloat in part because of cuts made in the past.

“We’re a financially sound district,” Habeck said. “The school board and I have used staff attrition … and that sort of thing to keep a sound district.”

Cadott also looks at all cost-savings measures, including using compressed natural gas to run its buses, which they’ve done for the past 20 years. Because of such steps, the district will not have to face the reductions other schools are making.

“We have not had to lay off staff or cut programs like other schools districts,” Habeck said.

However, the district is barely making revenues and expenses meet.

“We have to do all we can each year to get things to balance in the end,” Habeck said.

Cadott doesn’t anticipate adding any new programs to a budget that is already stretching thin.

“We’ve looked at our budget options, but we’re being very cautious about what we do,” Habeck said. “Now might not be a time to add new things, but how much of the present things that we have that we’ll be able to retain, that’s unknown.”

The unknown

Not knowing what lies ahead for schools hinders budget planning.

Cadott’s school district is aided heavily, so any changes made in funding models could have a dramatic impact on its budget.

“We’re in OK shape right now pending on things staying the same,” Habeck said. “If things change significantly or if the funding level dropped, then we’d have to revaluate things in a very serious way.”

The keys for Bloomer have been lower property values and a steady enrollment, Randall said.

School districts rely on steady or increased enrollments for their aid numbers to remain constant or rise. Randall hopes Bloomer area residents can keep their jobs and stay in the area, so the enrollment remains stable.

“Our funding is based on the number of students we have, and keeping our students and our schools strong is important because people will go where the schools are strong,” she said.

Enrollment in Cadott has also been steady, though Habeck would like to see it increase.

Both superintendents said the current economy and federal and state budget strains hinder all schools.

“The districts that have been able to hold steady and hold firm are finding that there’s no way to fend off reductions based on our current economy,” Randall said. “It’s going to be hard for everyone, and schools are no exception.”

“All schools have a tough time,” Habeck said. “It doesn’t matter the size.”

 



PLEASE NOTE:

Comments on stories that are updated may disappear with each update. The comments below are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Chippewa Herald.

COMMENTS:

CA Citizen wrote on Jan 19, 2009 10:26 PM:

" I am laughing right now, there is no mention of the 800,000 dollars missing money in the cadott system. hmm. sounds like a lovely cover up. "

alpine wrote on Jan 9, 2009 8:53 AM:

" Spending for something like the house that was purchased and torn down in Bloomer is at question, no doubt. In reality it is a drop in the bucket. The title of this article has to do with Bloomer being forced to make cuts. So what about Bloomer. They far over spent on a middle school was a start to their problems (and problems of all tax payers) That building stands as a monument to fiscal irresponsibility and a symbol of the power held by the teachers union. The real issue isn't just Bloomer, Bloomer School District is just one small scab on a body infected with disease. Over lapping of school districts is the biggest problem, do away with that problem and a middle school like the one recently built in Bloomer is justified. The next problem is the bloated contracts teachers have for their retirement. A better use of the school year (involving shortening it) is next. Throwing money up in the air in the name of education does NOT provide better education. "

bloomres wrote on Jan 8, 2009 3:53 PM:

" I agree that some of the smaller districts will have to combine in the future, but Bloomer has put themselves in this position with poor spending. Just last year they purchased a house near the high school for approx. $60,000 and then spent approx. another $60,000 to tear it down!! That is $120,000 of money that should be put towards education. I realize that it was a loan that tax payers will pay back, but this just goes to show how unwise the school board has been over the last decade. Hopefully the new board will be able to right the ship and stand up to the "free spending" administration of the past. "

alpine wrote on Jan 7, 2009 9:10 AM:

" There are a lot of various solutions that would save billions of dollars to our state government school system that would still provide an equal or even better education to our young people. For the most part though the changes would have to start with the all powerful teachers union. This is a union more powerful than the UAW and has run itself in a similar fashion. Now these changes we're talking about (no more over lapping of districts, no more pensions or lifetime medical for the retired, shorter school year yet as much or more work load, etc. etc.) would rock the cherry lined boat these people have been rocked to sleep in for too long. The staus quo would be comprimised. You see, it's not about making tough decisions and doing what's right. It's still about the gravy train to these people and they'll keep it running as long as we let them. "

chip wrote on Jan 6, 2009 5:56 PM:

" Even though the Chippewa School system appears to be ok financially, I often wondered why schools required students to be in school ALL DAY despite the fact that the majority of them are not credit deficient and are taking repeat classes just to fill a day. Both my kids in their senior year took repeat classes (classes they had before) just to fill a day because they were required by law to be in school all day. Seems like an opportunity here to cut some costs. When I was in high school I only went for two classes my senior year because that's all I needed to graduate. "

alpine wrote on Jan 6, 2009 2:39 PM:

" "Maybe consolidate some of the secondary schools, but then H.S. sports would get a lot less interesting around here. :)
I can't support consolidation of elementary schools. though. "
HS sports are in trouble, most of them will be program funded before to long limiting the scope. I would agree about elementary schooling in some areas, some not. Middle School and High School is a different matter, New Auburn is a good example of a town that should not have a school beyond elementary. Tough times are not just coming and they will be with us a long time. Tough decisions should have been made a ling time ago, we will soon be forced to make them. "

Blackhawkforever wrote on Jan 6, 2009 1:39 PM:

" Alpine I get your point about consolidation, but I have to say there are downsides to that too.
It can be a real long day for a kindergartner in New Auburn to think their going to get on a bus and go to school in Eau Claire, or Chippewa, Rice Lake, Menomonie or wherever. It's already over 9 hours with bus time for kiddies on the edges of current districts.
Maybe consolidate some of the secondary schools, but then H.S. sports would get a lot less interesting around here. :)
I can't support consolidation of elementary schools. though. "

ALPINE wrote on Jan 6, 2009 8:16 AM:

" "Don't blame the building of buildings, or Mr Martin Or the board, they are doing all they can, look at where the majority of the money goes: staffing "
Duplicated administration costs (staffing) are a mojor culprit indeed, along with the costs of building and maintaining unneccesary buildings in towns should not have schools. That brings us back to the over lapping of school districts issue. Couple that with benefits paid to teachers that do not even teach anymore and other considerations and we're where we're at. The biggest problem is the over lapping but teachers pensions and life time medical need to go away and now. They can invest in a 401K like the little people do and plan for their own health care costs like the little people do. "

readerb wrote on Jan 6, 2009 8:04 AM:

" Did no one read the entire article? The reason Bloomer is facing cuts is not from mismanagement, but from settling a half million dollar contract with the teacher's union. that meant paid back wages for 2 years worth of time. Many other district will face the same thing as soon as contract negotiations are settled. To find out where the money goes, look at the health care benefits teachers receive. They have better health care plans than most of us and their union is un-shakeable with taxpayer woes. They do not care if districts make cuts that affect students, as long as they continue to keep the cadillac health care. Teachers deserve respect and good wages, but to continue to hold districts hostage and provide better benefits to their teachers than the majority of the taxpayers get seems to be counter productive to helping teach our children.
Don't blame the building of buildings, or Mr Martin Or the board, they are doing all they can, look at where the majority of the money goes: staffing "

checking in wrote on Jan 5, 2009 6:18 PM:

" To spaztastic; where does your comment fit in to this article about "why does law enforcement seem to have all of the fancy gadgets?" For one thing the law enforcement budget does not affect the schools budget! Would you rather the Police just had a gun to take you down with? Or would you rather the used a taser or a night stick? Would you rather whave them use radar to catch the person speeding down the road or have that speeder hit and kill or wound a loved one? This list goes on.......and to conclude this you sound like you need an education so you can get with the program! I am sure Mrs. Randall is doing everything she can to recover from many years of the Mr. Martin days! It didn't help that the budget wasn't watched closer a few years ago. Good luck Bloomer, I know you need all the help you can get. Wonder if since the budgets getting cut if that means the tax payer will get a break? Ya right! "

chip wrote on Jan 5, 2009 6:05 PM:

" Did anyone read the previous article "thinking ahead has saved chippewa falls schools money?" Sounds like they will just be fine this year and not have to make any drastic changes. This is called strong leadership and apparently this is lacking in Bloomer, the ability to plan ahead. Instead, the Bloomer schools have become fat and unwilling to practice fiscal responsibility. "

alpine wrote on Jan 5, 2009 4:21 PM:

" " Combine districts, and spend what little savings there would be on bus fuel?"

We're not talking about bussing kids across the state. In many cases it's just 10-15 miles down the road. Fuel costs are absolutely nothing in comparison to the costs of building these new buildings in every little town, maintaining unneccesary buildings, and the administration costs. No comparison. "

Rainbird wrote on Jan 5, 2009 3:39 PM:

" Combine districts, and spend what little savings there would be on bus fuel? In the future, most everything that is done on a large scale is going to fail. We have to cut back and localize and learn to live smaller. "

alpine wrote on Jan 5, 2009 2:47 PM:

" There is plenty of money to educate our young people, the problem is and continues to be in how it is spent/wasted. Billions of dollars spent on "education" continue to be wasted on the over lapping school district issue alone, not to mention retirement contracts (see the domestic automakers) for teachers and administration and the length of our school year. Check into what cutting just 5 days from our present 180 school days would save just one school system. Eliminate the end of the year screw off days and the savings state wide is huge. Won't be done though even though it is the right thing to do. Everybody looks out for their own special interest and thus the status quo continues to drag us all down. "

spaztastic wrote on Jan 5, 2009 2:17 PM:

" wow, it's sad that we can never seem to have enough money to educate the future of our country.....Why is law enforcement always seems have all the fancy new toys and gadgets. "

alpine wrote on Jan 5, 2009 11:27 AM:

" Well what did anyone expect, and this is just the tip of the iceberg. Things as they are the new middle school in Bloomer and the new schools in many other towns stand as a monument to fiscal irresponsibility. I say "things as they are" in reference to the real problem with our government school system, the over lapping of school districts. These cuts will become larger as our federal government has a real crisis on its hands, and there are no short term answers. The answer is to combine districts, eliminate administration and buildings. Those are the cuts that need to be made, they are the only cuts that will have long lasting affect. The tax payers have been bled to near death and the federal gravy train run is over. Schools in smaller towns need to close and those children bussed to nearby towns. That would at least justify what a town like Bloomer has built itself. We need leaders who truly understand the difference between needs and wants. "

LOGIN / REGISTER:

*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

I agree to the terms and conditions

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



MORE News


THIS WEEK'S TOP STORIES


MOST COMMENTED STORIES




Advertisements





Letter to the Editor | Comment about our Website

Copyright © 2009 Chippewa Valley Newspapers. All Rights Reserved.
All Chippewa Valley Newspapers pages are designed for screen resolutions set at 1024x768 or higher.
Click for our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use applicable to this site.